https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25675 Wed 18 Jan 2017 16:39:18 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:53372 Wed 07 Feb 2024 15:05:24 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52652 Thu 19 Oct 2023 15:25:11 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44079 Thu 06 Oct 2022 14:45:30 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25342 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:24:39 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25339 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:24:39 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:53782 Mon 15 Jan 2024 10:24:07 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44157 Mindframe media guidelines for reporting on suicide. Results: A total of 17 documents across 12 media agencies were identified. Ten of the 12 agencies provided specific advice about the reporting of suicide, with all agencies that issue codes of practice or editorial policies including between two and 10 recommendations aligned with the Mindframe guidelines. Conclusions: While the results of this study are positive, significant variation between media agencies shows that there are opportunities to enhance adoption and implementation of evidence-informed guidance for media professionals in Australia. So what?: With over 3000 people dying by suicide and over 60 000 people attempting suicide each year in Australia, the prevention of suicide remains a key public health priority requiring a multi-sector and health-in-all-policies approach. This study reveals that there is a strong platform for ongoing collaboration with the Australian media to ensure safe and sensitive coverage of suicide.]]> Mon 10 Oct 2022 09:31:40 AEDT ]]>